“Do Not Touch”…?

“Do Not Touch.” These are three little words that litter museums and galleries the world over. I see the point of the signs urging people not to touch things (or in some cases “Touch them with your eyes.” No, really.) but there is something alienating about seeing the message “HANDS OFF!” everywhere you look. “THIS ISN’T FOR YOU” is what comes screaming from the labels.

There are nicer ways of saying “This object/artwork/whatever is very delicate and touching it will cause damage, so please be careful. ” Maybe adding “Although you can’t touch this object, you can touch things from our handling collection…”

Sometimes though, when I see parents try to put their kids on statues so they can take a “cute photo of their trip to the museum” I totally understand why the language used is so bald.  Everyone who has worked in a museum has heard the horror stories of people doing all sorts of things with the objects (and I do mean *all sorts*).

Do…Kiss the Art?

Anyway, that slight digression aside, I want to talk about what sparked this post. My friend and colleague, the lovely and ever-enthusiastic Rosie Clarke  has recently returned from a trip to Amsterdam where she experienced their version of Museums at Night: Museumnacht. She brought back a brochure which featured some intriguing images:

Lipstick on a statue
Lipstick on a statue
man with statue
Is he kissing the statue? Whispering sweet nothings?
Arms around a Statue
Arms embracing a Statue
Kissing a Statue
Kissing a Statue

I found these images really powerful. Just look, it’s people getting frisky with statues! There’s something really Pygmalion about it, but the message seems to be “it’s OK to be passionate about Art!” Or maybe it’s a has a more “Fall in Love with History” kind of vibe depending on who the statue is. I can’t read Dutch, so I couldn’t read the brochure to find out more about them; the concept behind the images could even have been about various night-time activities – you know the ones – and putting them in the museum-y context for the after-hours festival?

Here’s another example of someone getting close to art.

Marilyn Monroe and Discobolus
Marilyn Monroe and Discobolus

Here we see the delightful Marilyn Monroe embracing famed thrower of discuses, Discobolus. Although her embrace of the statue is more platonic than the sexually charged images above, it’s interesting to see how much fun she’s having holding the discus-thrower.

Besides, it’s always nice to have a picture of Marilyn.

Back to those three little words though… sometimes they are unavoidable, but being able to touch something really helps to form a connection, and isn’t that one thing museums strive to do? Form connections? Wouldn’t it be nice to see a little more emphasis on what you can get up close and personal with rather than what we have to keep at arms length?




2 Comments Add yours

  1. At my old gallery we had a guy who came in regularly to lick the calves on a portrait of George IV. No idea why. We’d never seen him before that exhibition and never saw him after it ended.

    1. Wow. That’s quite something! :S

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s